A revista The Economist publicou o seguinte comentário sobre um artigo científico publicado na revista Science:
http://www.economist.com/node/18678925
Vale a leitura do comentário e do artigo original (resumo aqui):
We compared the amounts of learning achieved using two different instructional approaches under controlled conditions. We measured the learning of a specific set of topics and objectives when taught by 3 hours of traditional lecture given by an experienced highly rated instructor and 3 hours of instruction given by a trained but inexperienced instructor using instruction based on research in cognitive psychology and physics education. The comparison was made between two large sections (N = 267 and N = 271) of an introductory undergraduate physics course. We found increased student attendance, higher engagement, and more than twice the learning in the section taught using research-based instruction.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário